Rewrite a support policy excerpt in plain customer language
Pasting raw policy text into a customer reply damages trust and creates confusion. This prompt rewrites legal or internal policy language into clear, direct customer-facing explanations that still hold the policy's intent.
You are a plain-language editor for a customer support team. I will give you a policy excerpt and the context in which a support rep needs to explain it. Do the following:
1. Identify every phrase in the policy that a non-specialist customer would find ambiguous or off-putting.
2. Rewrite the excerpt in plain language. Use second person ('you / your'). Keep sentences under 20 words where possible. Do not omit any conditions or limits — this must still be accurate.
3. If there are conditions that work against the customer (e.g., eligibility cutoffs, exclusions), keep them visible — do not bury them.
4. Write one transition sentence a rep can use to introduce this explanation naturally in a reply (not 'As per our policy...').
5. Flag anything in the policy that is genuinely unclear even after rewriting — these may need legal or product clarification before use.
Policy excerpt: {{POLICY_EXCERPT}}
Context (what the customer asked or what the rep needs to explain): {{EXPLANATION_CONTEXT}}
Brand tone (e.g., formal, conversational, warm): {{BRAND_TONE}}
Do not soften conditions to the point of inaccuracy. If a limit exists, it must appear in the rewrite. {{POLICY_EXCERPT}}{{EXPLANATION_CONTEXT}}{{BRAND_TONE}}
How to use this prompt
- Copy the prompt above (Copy button on the top-right).
- Replace each
{{VAR}}with your own value. Variables:{{POLICY_EXCERPT}}{{EXPLANATION_CONTEXT}}{{BRAND_TONE}}. - Paste it into one of the recommended tools below.
- Iterate: tighten constraints in the prompt if the output is generic.
Why this prompt is structured this way
The prompt is split into explicit steps because LLMs do better when the path is named, not implied. Each variable forces specificity at the input layer — vague inputs get vague outputs.
Pair this prompt with a tool
Grammarly
$12/moGrammar, tone, and clarity across every app.
Grammarly remains the default for grammar + tone checking. The 'Grammarly Go' generative features are catching up but are not the main reason to subscribe.
QuillBot
$10/moParaphrasing + summarizing that actually preserves meaning.
QuillBot's paraphraser is the best in the category — it has actual modes (formal, simple, creative) instead of just rewording. Free tier is generous.
Claude (Anthropic)
$0/mo (Pro at $20)Frontier model with long context and strong reasoning.
Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku tiers) is the assistant favored by writers and engineers who care about reasoning quality and tone. 1M token context on Opus.
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
$0/mo (Plus at $20)The category-defining general-purpose AI assistant.
ChatGPT has the broadest feature surface: image gen, voice, custom GPTs, web browsing, code execution. Often the right default; sometimes beaten on specific tasks by Claude or Perplexity.
The PlaybookPrompts weekly
One short email per week. The five sharpest prompts we found, one tool worth your attention, one anti-pattern to avoid. Unsubscribe in one click.
Newsletter signup is not configured. Set PUBLIC_NEWSLETTER_USERNAME in the build env.