Rebuild a confusing explanation with proper learning scaffolding
Sometimes you've re-read an explanation three times and still don't have it. This prompt diagnoses why it's confusing and rebuilds it with the prerequisite knowledge and structure that was missing.
The following explanation of {{CONCEPT}} is not landing for me. Here it is:
{{CONFUSING_EXPLANATION}}
My background: {{MY_BACKGROUND}} (describe relevant knowledge you do and don't have).
1. Diagnose why this explanation is likely failing for someone with my background. Be specific — identify the exact moment or sentence where it assumes knowledge I don't have, skips a logical step, or uses jargon without grounding it.
2. List the prerequisite concepts I need to understand before the explanation can work. For each prerequisite:
- Define it in plain language in 1-2 sentences.
- Explain how it connects to {{CONCEPT}}.
3. Rewrite the explanation from scratch, building from the prerequisites. The rewrite should:
- Define every term before using it.
- Introduce one idea at a time.
- Use a concrete example drawn from {{MY_BACKGROUND}} or an everyday context I'm likely familiar with.
4. End with a one-paragraph summary that I could use to explain {{CONCEPT}} to a colleague from memory.
If the original explanation is actually correct and clear, and the issue is a specific prerequisite I'm missing rather than a flaw in the explanation, tell me that directly rather than rewriting unnecessarily. {{CONCEPT}}{{CONFUSING_EXPLANATION}}{{MY_BACKGROUND}}
How to use this prompt
- Copy the prompt above (Copy button on the top-right).
- Replace each
{{VAR}}with your own value. Variables:{{CONCEPT}}{{CONFUSING_EXPLANATION}}{{MY_BACKGROUND}}. - Paste it into one of the recommended tools below.
- Iterate: tighten constraints in the prompt if the output is generic.
Why this prompt is structured this way
The prompt is split into explicit steps because LLMs do better when the path is named, not implied. Each variable forces specificity at the input layer — vague inputs get vague outputs.
Pair this prompt with a tool
QuillBot
$10/moParaphrasing + summarizing that actually preserves meaning.
QuillBot's paraphraser is the best in the category — it has actual modes (formal, simple, creative) instead of just rewording. Free tier is generous.
Perplexity
$0/mo (Pro at $20)AI search engine with citations.
Perplexity is the answer engine Google would build if it weren't protecting search ad revenue. Cited answers, follow-up questions, focused source modes.
Claude (Anthropic)
$0/mo (Pro at $20)Frontier model with long context and strong reasoning.
Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku tiers) is the assistant favored by writers and engineers who care about reasoning quality and tone. 1M token context on Opus.
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
$0/mo (Plus at $20)The category-defining general-purpose AI assistant.
ChatGPT has the broadest feature surface: image gen, voice, custom GPTs, web browsing, code execution. Often the right default; sometimes beaten on specific tasks by Claude or Perplexity.
The PlaybookPrompts weekly
One short email per week. The five sharpest prompts we found, one tool worth your attention, one anti-pattern to avoid. Unsubscribe in one click.
Newsletter signup is not configured. Set PUBLIC_NEWSLETTER_USERNAME in the build env.