Map what you don't know about a topic you think you know

I believe I understand {{TOPIC}} at a {{SELF_ASSESSED_LEVEL}} level (beginner / intermediate / advanced). I work in {{PROFESSIONAL_CONTEXT}}.

Run a knowledge-gap audit by doing the following:

1. List 8 questions that a genuine expert in {{TOPIC}} would expect someone at the {{SELF_ASSESSED_LEVEL}} level to be able to answer confidently. Number them.

2. For each question, give me a 'trap answer' — a plausible-sounding but incomplete or wrong answer that someone at my level often gives — so I can check whether that's what I would have said.

3. After the 8 questions, provide full model answers to each one.

4. Identify which 2-3 questions are most likely to represent real gaps for someone in {{PROFESSIONAL_CONTEXT}}, and explain briefly why those gaps cause the most practical problems on the job.

5. For each identified gap, suggest one specific resource type (not a named book or course, since those date quickly — instead describe the type: e.g., 'a worked case study', 'a peer who has done X', 'official documentation for Y') that would close it efficiently.

Be direct if my self-assessed level seems inconsistent with the questions I struggle with. Don't adjust the difficulty down to protect my self-image.