Write a style guide spec for a custom illustration system
When briefing illustrators or generating consistent AI art, a written style spec is more reliable than a mood board alone. This prompt produces a language-based style guide that any illustrator or image model can follow.
You are an art director. Write a written style guide for a custom illustration system for {{BRAND_NAME}}, a {{BRAND_DESCRIPTION}}.
Reference aesthetic (optional): {{REFERENCE_AESTHETIC}} (e.g., 'Penguin Books covers from the 1960s' or 'leave blank if none')
1. Line quality: Describe stroke weight, consistency, and edge treatment (e.g., 'uniform 2pt strokes, no tapering, hard edges only').
2. Color system: Define a palette of 4-6 colors with their role (primary, accent, neutral, background). Name them descriptively, not just by hex (e.g., 'dust clay' not '#C4A882').
3. Form language: Describe how shapes should feel—geometric vs. organic, simplified vs. detailed, flat vs. dimensional.
4. Subject matter: List 5 subjects or scenes that fit this style and 3 that must never appear.
5. Texture and finish: Describe any texture, grain, or paper-feel. If the style is clean/digital, say so explicitly.
6. One negative example: Describe in detail an illustration that would look wrong for this brand—be specific enough that an illustrator would immediately understand the boundary.
This prompt works best when the brand already has 2+ visual touchpoints. If starting from zero, complete a visual language spec first. {{BRAND_NAME}}{{BRAND_DESCRIPTION}}{{REFERENCE_AESTHETIC}}
How to use this prompt
- Copy the prompt above (Copy button on the top-right).
- Replace each
{{VAR}}with your own value. Variables:{{BRAND_NAME}}{{BRAND_DESCRIPTION}}{{REFERENCE_AESTHETIC}}. - Paste it into one of the recommended tools below.
- Iterate: tighten constraints in the prompt if the output is generic.
Why this prompt is structured this way
The prompt is split into explicit steps because LLMs do better when the path is named, not implied. Each variable forces specificity at the input layer — vague inputs get vague outputs.
Pair this prompt with a tool
Leonardo.ai
$12/moImage generation with style consistency and control.
Leonardo competes with Midjourney but adds first-class control: ControlNet, style transfer, fine-tuned models per use case. Better workflow for repeat-use brand imagery.
Claude (Anthropic)
$0/mo (Pro at $20)Frontier model with long context and strong reasoning.
Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku tiers) is the assistant favored by writers and engineers who care about reasoning quality and tone. 1M token context on Opus.
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
$0/mo (Plus at $20)The category-defining general-purpose AI assistant.
ChatGPT has the broadest feature surface: image gen, voice, custom GPTs, web browsing, code execution. Often the right default; sometimes beaten on specific tasks by Claude or Perplexity.
Midjourney
$10/moThe aesthetic king of AI image generation.
Midjourney still produces the most stylistically distinctive imagery of any image model. The Discord-native workflow is divisive but the web app caught up in 2025.
The PlaybookPrompts weekly
One short email per week. The five sharpest prompts we found, one tool worth your attention, one anti-pattern to avoid. Unsubscribe in one click.
Newsletter signup is not configured. Set PUBLIC_NEWSLETTER_USERNAME in the build env.